Utilization of physiotherapy services and associated factors among stroke survivors attending hospitals in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2026.3885Keywords:
Ethiopia, Factors, Gondar Town, Physiotherapy utilization, Stroke, ServiceAbstract
Introduction: The physiotherapy service plays a vital role in stroke rehabilitation by improving mobility, reducing disability, and enhancing quality of life. This study assessed physiotherapy service utilization and associated factors among stroke survivors attending hospitals in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2025. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select participants. Data was collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire supported by medical record review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 in the Bivariable regression were entered into a multivariable logistic regression, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 400 stroke survivors participated in the study, of whom 46.75% utilized physiotherapy services. Utilization of physiotherapy service was significantly associated with the acute phase of stroke survivors (AOR = 1.63, p < 0.000), stroke survivors those who were dependence in activities of daily living (AOR = 1.07, p = 0.002), stroke survivors with balance impairment (AOR = 1.12, p = 0.019), and those with abnormal speed of mobility (AOR = 1.01, p = 0.018) were significantly associated with utilization of physiotherapy service.
Conclusion: Physiotherapy service utilization among stroke survivors in Gondar Town was suboptimal. Utilization was significantly associated among patients in the acute phase and those with dependence in activities of daily living, balance impairment and abnormal speed of mobility. Improving access, strengthening referral systems, and enhancing follow-up care are recommended to increase physiotherapy service utilization.
Downloads
Introduction
Stroke is recognized as one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability worldwide, with profound consequences for individuals, families, and health systems (1). Globally, millions of people experience stroke each year, and a substantial proportion live with permanent functional impairments requiring rehabilitation services such as physiotherapy (2). These disabilities often limit independence, reduce productivity, and increase reliance on caregivers, imposing considerable social and economic burdens (3).
Physiotherapy plays a central role in post-stroke rehabilitation by improving motor function, enhancing independence, and promoting quality of life. Early and consistent physiotherapy has been shown to significantly improve functional outcomes and reduce long-term complications (2-4). Despite its importance, access to and utilization of physiotherapy services remain uneven, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where health systems face resource limitations and structural challenges (5-7).
The utilization of physiotherapy among stroke survivors is influenced by a combination of patient-related, socioeconomic, and institutional factors (8,9). Patient-related factors include age, stroke severity, and the presence of comorbidities, while socioeconomic conditions such as income, education, and family support also play a critical role in determining service uptake (10). Institutional factors, including the availability of trained physiotherapists, adequate infrastructure, and structured therapy schedules, further shape access to and continuity of rehabilitation services (11). A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential to guide targeted interventions that enhance physiotherapy utilization and improve functional recovery outcomes (9,12).
In Africa, the burden of stroke has grown markedly over the past decades, driven by rising rates of hypertension, diabetes, and other non-communicable diseases (13,14). Evidence indicates that stroke incidence in sub-Saharan Africa is higher than previously estimated, with younger populations increasingly affected compared to global averages (15,16). Despite this growing burden, physiotherapy services remain limited due to inadequate infrastructure, shortages of skilled professionals, and insufficient health financing (17). Consequently, many stroke survivors experience poor functional outcomes and prolonged disability, underscoring the urgent need for institutional strengthening and evidence-based interventions (18).
Ethiopia reflects many of these continental challenges, with increasing stroke admissions reported in hospitals and growing rehabilitation needs (19,20). Physiotherapy services were recognized as essential but remain limited in scope and accessibility (21). Barriers such as financial constraints, transportation challenges, and limited awareness reduce utilization, particularly among chronic-phase survivors (19,22). At the same time, patients who receive consistent and early physiotherapy demonstrate significantly better recovery in terms of mobility, independence, and reintegration into daily life (23,24). Importantly, no prior study has investigated physiotherapy service utilization and associated factors among stroke survivors in Gondar Town. This lack of local evidence highlights a significant knowledge gap and underscores the need for context-specific research to guide healthcare planning, optimize resource allocation, and develop interventions that improve access, continuity, and functional recovery.
Therefore, this study aims to assess the utilization of physiotherapy services and associated factors among stroke survivors attending hospitals in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods
Study design and period
An institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from April to May 2025 to assess the utilization of physiotherapy services and identify the associated factors among stroke survivors attending hospitals in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia.
Study Area and Setting
The study was conducted in Gondar town, one of the major urban centers in the Amhara Regional State, situated approximately 780 kilometers northwest of Addis Ababa. The town was located at an elevation of 1,859 meters above sea level (44). Gondar serves as a medical center for the surrounding districts and provides a wide range of health services, including specialized care and rehabilitation. The town had four hospitals that deliver physiotherapy and stroke-related healthcare services. These include two governmental hospitals: the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoGCSH), which serves as a tertiary referral center and Ayira Referral Hospital and two private hospitals, namely Nur General Hospital and Ibex General Hospital. Together, these hospitals provide both inpatient and outpatient services and have operational physiotherapy units staffed with qualified physiotherapists who manage stroke rehabilitation among other conditions. This diverse healthcare environment makes Gondar Town an ideal setting for assessing physiotherapy utilization among stroke survivors.
Study Population
Source Population: All stroke survivors attending any of the four hospitals in Gondar town during the study period.
Study Population: Stroke survivors visiting the selected hospitals (UoGCSH, Ayira Referral Hospital, Nur General Hospital, and Ibex General Hospital) during the data collection period and who meet the eligibility criteria.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The study included stroke survivors aged 18 years and above who had been diagnosed with either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke by a physician. Participants must be receiving either inpatient or outpatient care in any of the four hospitals in Gondar Town. Additionally, only individuals who are able to communicate verbally or with the assistance of a reliable caretaker were considered eligible for the study.
Exclusion Criteria: Individuals with severe cognitive impairment confirmed by using the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) checklist (25), who do not have a caregiver capable of providing accurate information, were not included. Patients who have visited physiotherapy services only once for assessment without subsequent follow-up sessions were also excluded.
Sample Size Determination and Sampling Procedure
Since no prior study has assessed physiotherapy service utilization and associated factors among stroke survivors in Gondar town, the single population proportion formula was used, assuming a prevalence (p) of 50% to maximize sample size, a 95% confidence interval (Z = 1.96), and a 5% margin of error (d = 0.05)(45).
By adding a 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was 424 participants.
After calculating the final sample size, participants were selected from each hospital using a systematic random sampling technique. The total sample was proportionally allocated across the four selected hospitals based on their respective patient loads.
The sampling interval (K = N/n) was calculated and found to be 2. To minimize selection bias, the first participant in each hospital was chosen randomly using a lottery method. Thereafter, participants were selected systematically based on their order of arrival in the medical and physiotherapy departments of the hospital, where every second eligible stroke survivor was recruited until the required sample size for each hospital was achieved.
To ensure data quality and prevent duplication, participant charts were reviewed carefully, marked using a special marker after inclusion, and checked throughout the data collection process. Verbal confirmation was also obtained from participants or caregivers when necessary.
The total study population across the four hospitals was 792 stroke survivors, including 207 stroke survivors from the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoGCSH), 198 from Ayira Referral Hospital, 198 from Nur General Hospital, and 189 from Ibex General Hospital. Data collection continued in each hospital until the final required sample size of 424 participants was achieved (Fig. 1).
Study Variables
Dependent Variable
Utilization of Physiotherapy service (Yes/No)
Independent Variables
Socio-demographic factors: age, sex, occupation, education, income, residence, marital status
Figure 1 -. Sampling procedure for assessing physiotherapy service utilization and associated factors among stroke survivors in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia.
Psychosocial factors: Depressive symptoms
Clinical factors: stroke type, severity, comorbidities, duration since onset (phase).
Mobility and functional factors: Speed of mobility, activity of daily living, balance impairment, and use of mobility aids.
Operational definitions
Utilization of Physiotherapy service: In this study, it was defined as a stroke survivor’s attendance of at least two or more physiotherapy sessions after a confirmed stroke diagnosis. It was measured through patient self-report during interviews and verified using hospital physiotherapy attendance records (26).
Balance impairment (BI): Presence of deficits in balance problem, measured using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS), with scores 0-20 indicating balance impairment, and scores 21-56 indicating no impairment (27).
Activity of Daily Living (ADL): The degree of independence in performing ADLs, assessed using the Barthel Index, an ordinal scale, assessed activities of daily living, with scores ≤60 indicating dependence and scores 61-100 indicating independence (28).
Mobility aid usage: Use of any device to assist movement, including a cane, walker, or wheelchair (29).
Stroke Type: Classified as either ischemic stroke, caused by obstruction of blood flow to the brain, or hemorrhagic stroke, was confirmed through medical records (30).
Duration Since Onset: The time elapsed between the initial stroke event and the date of data collection, measured in weeks or months. It is categorized as acute phase (1–6 months) or chronic phase (>6 months) (31).
Comorbidities: Other medical conditions present alongside stroke, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, or renal disorders, as recorded in the patient’s medical chart (32).
Depression symptoms: Using the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS-SF), participants who score <5 are normal, and a score > 5 indicates a depressive symptom (33).
Speed of Mobility: was measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, defined as the time in seconds required for a participant to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn, return, and sit down; longer times indicate reduced mobility (34).
Data collection procedure
Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire consisting of four sections: socio-demographic characteristics, clinical, medical health and comorbidity-related factors, psychosocial factors, and functional status. The questionnaire was originally developed in English, translated into Amharic, and back-translated to maintain linguistic consistency. Trained physiotherapists conducted the interviews after obtaining informed consent from each participant.
Data Quality Assurance
A pretest was conducted on 5% of the sample in Debre Tabor Hospital to assess the clarity and reliability of the questionnaire. Data collectors and supervisors received comprehensive training on the study protocol, ethical considerations, and data collection procedures. Daily supervision and review of completed questionnaires were conducted to ensure completeness and accuracy. Inconsistencies were addressed promptly.
Data Processing and Analysis
Data were entered into EPI Info version 7 and exported to SPSS version 25 for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p = 0.934) was employed to assess model fitness (35). Multicollinearity was evaluated using variance inflation factors (VIF < 10) (36). Variables with a p-value <0.25 in bivariate logistic regression were included in the multivariable logistic regression model (37). Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05, and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.
Result
Socio-demographic characteristics
A total of 400 stroke survivors participated in this study at Gondar Town Hospital, yielding a response rate with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 46.58% to 56.38%. The remaining participants were unwilling to respond and provided incomplete data. The participants ranged in age from 18 to 95 years, with half (50%) aged between 61 and 95 years. More than half of the respondents were female (57.5%). Regarding marital status, 54% were unmarried.
In terms of educational status, the majority of participants (82.5%) had no formal education. Nearly half (48.5%) of respondents reported a monthly income of less than 1000 Ethiopian birr, indicating a generally low socioeconomic status among the study population.
With respect to occupation, the largest proportion of participants (23.25%) were engaged in non-governmental organization-related work, reflecting limited formal employment opportunities among stroke survivors in the study setting (Table 1).
Clinical, Comorbidity, Confirmed Medical, and Psychosocial Characteristics of Stroke Survivors
Among the 400 stroke survivors, hemorrhagic stroke was the most common type (49.8%). Right hemisphere involvement was slightly more frequent (49.8%) compared to the left. More than half of the participants (57%) were in the acute or sub-acute phase, while 43% were in the chronic phase.
Comorbidity was reported in 17% of survivors. Depression symptoms were present in 47% of participants, whereas 53% were classified as not depressed (Table 2).
Mobility and Functional Characteristics of Stroke Survivors
A substantial proportion of participants experienced significant functional limitations following stroke. More than half (58.25%) were dependent in activities of daily living (ADL). Similarly, 51.5% had balance impairment, and 54.75% exhibited abnormal speed of mobility. In addition, 59.75% of participants reported using mobility aids, indicating a high level of functional dependency within the study population (Table 3).
| Variable | Frequency(n) | Percent (%) | Physio Utilization (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||||
| Age | |||||||
| 18-40 | 101 | 25.25% | 74 | 27 | 1 | 1 | |
| 41-60 | 99 | 24.75% | 76 | 23 | 0.82 (0.43, 1.57) | 0.561 | |
| 61-95 | 200 | 50.00% | 37 | 163 | 12.07(6.84, 14.28) | 0.000 | |
| Sex | |||||||
| Male | 170 | 42.5% | 77 | 93 | 1 | 1 | |
| Female | 230 | 57.5% | 110 | 120 | 0.90 (0.61, 1.34) | 0.616 | |
| Marital Status | |||||||
| Married | 184 | 46% | 85 | 99 | 1 | 1 | |
| Unmarried | 216 | 54% | 102 | 114 | 1.16 (0.64, 1.42) | 0.838 | |
| Education | |||||||
| Formal educate | 70 | 17.5% | 30 | 40 | 1 | 1 | |
| Non-Educate | 330 | 82.5% | 157 | 173 | 0.82 (0.43, 1.39) | 0.473 | |
| Residence | |||||||
| Urban | 179 | 44.75% | 91 | 88 | 1 | 1 | |
| Rural | 221 | 55.25% | 96 | 125 | 1.34 (0.90, 2.00) | 0.141 | |
| Income level | |||||||
| <1000 | 194 | 48.5% | 100 | 94 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1001-2000 | 54 | 13.5% | 32 | 22 | 0.73 (0.39, 1.34) | 0.316 | |
| 2001-3000 | 51 | 12.75% | 20 | 31 | 1.64 (0.87, 3.09) | 0.119 | |
| >30000 | 101 | 25.25% | 35 | 66 | 2.01 (1.22, 3.29) | 0.006 | |
Physiotherapy service utilization
Overall, physiotherapy service utilization varied across socio-demographic, clinical, mobility and functional characteristics. Utilization was higher among younger participants, those with higher income levels, individuals in the chronic phase of stroke, and those without comorbid conditions or depressive symptoms.
Conversely, lower physiotherapy service utilization was observed among stroke survivors in the acute phase, those who were dependent in activities of daily living, individuals with balance impairment, and those with abnormal speed of mobility.
In the bivariable logistic regression analysis, variables with a p-value ≤ 0.25 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable logistic regression model (37). Based on these criteria, age, residence, income level, post-stroke duration, comorbidity, depression symptoms, activities of daily living, balance impairment, speed of mobility, and use of mobility aids were entered into the final multivariable model (Table 4).
Discussion
This cross-sectional study assessed the utilization of physiotherapy service and its determining factors among stroke survivors attending hospitals in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia. The study found that only 46.75% of stroke survivors utilized physiotherapy services, indicating that more than half of the survivors did not access rehabilitation despite having functional limitations. This low utilization highlights a substantial gap between physiotherapy needs and service uptake and underscores the need for target interventions to improve access and utilization.
| Variables | Frequency(n) | Percent (%) | Physio Utilization (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Type of stroke | ||||||
| undetermined | 6 | 1.5% | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Ischemic | 195 | 48.75% | 91 | 104 | 1.14 (0.22, 5.80) | 0.872 |
| Hemorrhagic | 199 | 49.75% | 93 | 106 | 1.13 (0.22,5.78) | 0.875 |
| Type of hemisphere | ||||||
| Undetermined | 13 | 3.25% | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| Right | 199 | 49.75% | 91 | 108 | 1.38 (0.44, 4.26) | 0.571 |
| Left | 188 | 47.00% | 89 | 99 | 1.29 (0.42, 4.01) | 0.65 |
| Post-stroke duration | ||||||
| Chronic | 172 | 43% | 143 | 29 | 1 | 1 |
| Acute | 228 | 57% | 44 | 184 | 20.62 (12.29,34.58) | 0.000 |
| Comorbidity | ||||||
| No | 332 | 83% | 167 | 165 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 68 | 17% | 20 | 48 | 2.42 (1.38, 4.27) | 0.002 |
| Depression Symptom | ||||||
| Not depressed | 212 | 53% | 166 | 46 | 1 | 1 |
| Depressed | 188 | 47% | 21 | 167 | 28.69 (16.41, 50.19) | 0.000 |
| Variable | Frequency(n) | Percent (%) | Physio Utilization (%) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Yes | No | |||||
| Activity of daily living | ||||||
| Independent | 167 | 41.75 % | 122 | 45 | 1 | 1 |
| Dependent | 233 | 58.25% | 65 | 168 | 7.01(4.48,10.94) | 0.000 |
| Balance impairment | ||||||
| No | 194 | 48. 5% | 159 | 35 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 206 | 51.5% | 28 | 178 | 28.87 (16.81, 49.60) | 0.000 |
| Speed of mobility | ||||||
| Normal | 181 | 45.25% | 150 | 31 | 1 | 1 |
| Abnormal | 219 | 54.75% | 37 | 182 | 23.80 (14.09,40.19) | 0.000 |
| Mobility aids | ||||||
| Without the use of aids | 161 | 40.25% | 132 | 29 | 1 | 1 |
| use aids | 239 | 59.75% | 55 | 184 | 15.22(9.21,25.16) | 0.000 |
| Variable | Physio Utilization | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Age | ||||||
| 18-40 | 74 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 41-60 | 76 | 23 | 0.82 (0.43, 1.57) | 0.41 (1.31, 4.78) | 0.365 | |
| 61-95 | 37 | 163 | 12.07 (6.84, 14.28) | 0.72 (0.68, 0.92) | 0.876 | |
| ADL | ||||||
| BI | ||||||
| No | 159 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 28 | 178 | 28.87 (16.81, 49.60) | 1.12 (0.18, 2.06) * | 0.019 | |
| Post Stroke duration | ||||||
| Chronic | 143 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Acute | 44 | 184 | 20.62 (12.29,34.58) | 1.63 (0.84, 2.41) ** | 0.000 | |
| Depression Symptom | ||||||
| Not Depressed | 166 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Depressed | 21 | 167 | 28.69(16.41, 50.19) | 0.77 (0.13, 1.95) | 0.097 | |
| Mobility aids | ||||||
| Without the use of aids | 132 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Use aids | 55 | 184 | 15.22 (9.21,25.16) | 0.41 (0.36, 1.21) | 0.297 | |
| Speed of mobility | ||||||
| Normal | 150 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Abnormal | 37 | 182 | 23.80 (14.09, 40.19) | 1.01 (0.17, 1.85) * | 0.018 | |
| Comorbidity | ||||||
| no | 167 | 165 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 20 | 48 | 2.42 (1.38, 4.27) | 0.22 (1.01, 1.57) | 0.582 | |
| Residence | ||||||
| Urbane | 91 | 88 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Rural | 96 | 125 | 1.34 (0.90, 2.00) | 0.21 (0.44, 0.88) | 0.516 | |
| Income level | ||||||
| <1000 | 100 | 94 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1001-2000 | 32 | 22 | 0.73(0.39, 1.34) | 0.26 (0.27, 1.73) | 0.267 | |
| 2001-3000 | 20 | 31 | 1.64 (0.87, 3.09) | 0.13 (0.12, 1.03) | 0.980 | |
| >30000 | 35 | 66 | 2.01 (1.22, 3.29) | 0.48 (0.37,1.34) | 0.265 | |
The Utilization of Physiotherapy service in this study was lower than reported from other low- and middle-income countries, such as India, where more than 67% of stroke survivors reported receiving physiotherapy treatment service (38). Furthermore, utilization remains substantially lower than in high-income countries. In Taiwan, 75% of hospitalized stroke survivors receive physiotherapy rehabilitation service as part of standard stroke care (39). This variation may also be due to those disparities in rehabilitation workforce capacity, healthcare financing, referral systems, and post-discharge follow-up mechanisms and methodological differences of the study.
However, the current study reported a higher prevalence of physiotherapy rehabilitation service utilization, with a study done in Ghana, 27% (40). Several factors may explain this discrepancy. First, differences in healthcare infrastructure may contribute; Gondar Town Hospitals, being urban referral centers, may have relatively better access to physiotherapy services compared with rural or resource-limited settings in Ghana and Nigeria. Second, variations in referral practices and hospital-based rehabilitation programs could influence utilization, as patients in Gondar may receive more systematic physiotherapy referrals during the acute and sub-acute phases of stroke.
Regarding the associated factors, the odds of physiotherapy service utilization were higher among patients with dependent activities of daily living (ADL) (AOR = 1.07), indicating that functional dependency was associated with an increased likelihood of using physiotherapy services. This may be explained by the greater level of disability, which increases the need for rehabilitation and often prompts caregiver involvement and referral from health professionals (41). However, despite this increased likelihood, their actual engagement remained limited due to caregiver burden, transportation difficulties, psychological challenges, and health system constraints. This suggests that greater functional need does not necessarily translate into sustained or consistent physiotherapy service utilization (42,43). This result is in line with a study conducted in Nigeria (44) and the United Kingdom (45).
In addition, survivors in the acute post-stroke phase had higher odds of physiotherapy service utilization compared to those in the chronic phase (AOR = 1.63), suggesting that the stage of recovery influences rehabilitation service use. This finding highlights how the stage of stroke recovery plays an important role in determining service utilization. The possible reasons for these were that acute patients are often hospitalized and closely monitored, which makes physiotherapy more accessible and strongly encouraged by clinical guidelines to prevent complications and promote early recovery (46). At this stage, both patients and caregivers may also feel more motivated and hopeful, driving them to engage in physiotherapy services. In contrast, survivors in the chronic phase frequently encounter barriers such as fatigue, reduced motivation, financial difficulties, transportation challenges, and caregiver burden, all of which can limit their continued participation in therapy (47). These results suggest that while acute stroke survivors benefit from structured hospital-based rehabilitation, chronic survivors need stronger follow-up systems and community-based programs to sustain engagement and improve long-term outcomes. This finding was in line with other studies conducted in Taiwan (48) and America (49).
Similarly, patients with balance impairment had higher odds of physiotherapy service utilization (AOR = 1.12). This may be because balance problems significantly affect mobility and independence, making rehabilitation more necessary and more likely to be recommended by clinicians (50). Nevertheless, utilization may still be hindered by fear of falling, reduced confidence, environmental barriers, and limited rehabilitation follow-up services. A possible reason for this finding is that balance dysfunction is a visible and clinically significant impairment that directly affects mobility, safety, and independence. Patients with balance impairment are at higher risk of falls, gait instability, and functional dependence, which may prompt clinicians to prioritize referral to physiotherapy services (51). In addition, stroke survivors who experience balance problems may perceive a greater need for rehabilitation due to fear of falling and difficulty performing daily activities, thereby increasing their motivation to seek physiotherapy care (52). Furthermore, balance impairment is often the focus of physiotherapy interventions, making affected individuals more likely to be enrolled in structured rehabilitation programs aimed at improving postural control, mobility, and functional independence (53). This finding was in line with other studies conducted in China (54) and Portugal (55).
The study found that stroke survivors with abnormal speed of mobility also showed higher odds of utilizing physiotherapy services (AOR = 1.01. A possible reason for this finding was that the abnormal speed of mobility reflects underlying motor deficits and impaired functional capacity, which directly affect independence in daily activities and overall mobility (56). Survivors with slower or irregular walking patterns are more likely to be identified by clinicians as needing targeted rehabilitation to improve gait, balance, and postural control (57). In addition, these survivors may perceive a greater need for physiotherapy to regain mobility and confidence in walking, while caregivers may encourage engagement in rehabilitation to reduce the risk of falls and dependency (58). Research has shown that gait speed is a sensitive marker of post-stroke functional limitation and quality of life, and slower gait or abnormal walking patterns often lead to increased participation in structured physiotherapy programs aimed at improving walking ability and functional independence (58). This finding was in line with other studies conducted in Spain and the USA (56,59).
Limitation of the study
This study was conducted exclusively in Hospitals in Gondar Town, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to rural populations across the country. Additionally, the cross-sectional design restricts the ability to establish causal relationships. The reliance on self-reported medical conditions may also introduce recall bias, potentially affecting the accuracy of the data.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Physiotherapy service utilization among stroke survivors in Gondar Town remains suboptimal despite a substantial burden of functional impairment. Utilization was significantly higher among patients in the acute phase and those with dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs), balance impairment, and abnormal speed of mobility. Barriers such as caregiver burden, transportation, and financial constraints limit continued use, particularly in chronic-phase patients. Improving access, strengthening referral systems, and enhancing follow-up care are recommended to increase utilization and improve recovery outcomes.
Acknowledgments
The authors extend their heartfelt appreciation to the study participants and data collectors for their generous cooperation and support. We also gratefully acknowledge the invaluable contributions of colleagues and friends whose guidance and encouragement were instrumental to the successful completion of this research.
Authors’ contributions
This study was conducted in conjunction with all authors. MG: planned and designed the study. YEA: contributed to data administration and paper writing. DMM: design, data collecting, analysis, and interpretation, in manuscript edition. GJB: data collection, analysis, interpretation, and preliminary article write-up. YWA: design, data collection, analysis, and writing the manuscript. MD: Design, Data Collection, and Analysis. ES: helped handle the data and wrote the manuscript. AY: data curation, editing, and supervision. MF: Design, Data Collection, and Analysis. MDT: design, data collecting, analysis, and wrote the manuscript. AZ: design, data collecting, analysis, and GBG: contributed to the analysis of the results. SF: design, data collection, analysis, interpretation. MK: initial manuscript write-up, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and manuscript edition. All writers contributed adequately to the work and accepted responsibility for the relevant sections of the text.
Ethics and consent to participate
Ethical clearance and approval to conduct the research were obtained from the ethical review committee of the School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, with the reference letter of Ref No/SoM 26/04/2025. The study was confirmed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration Statement’s guideline declaration for the 2013 version. Participation in this study was entirely voluntary, and participants had the option of refusing or participating after being informed about the study’s objective, length, benefits, and potential dangers. Data confidentiality was maintained during the investigation. The collected data were solely utilized for the study’s intended purpose. Before data collection, study participants from each selected place were told about the study and given written consent.
Other information
Corresponding author:
Melese Gobezie
email: melesegobezie10@gmail.com
Disclosures
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financial support: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability statement: The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available to the principal investigator upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Cook C, Stickley L, Ramey K, et al. Variables associated with occupational and physical therapy stroke rehabilitation utilization and outcomes. 2005;34(1):3-10. PMID: 15839599
- 2. Kim J, Olaiya MT, De Silva DA, et al. Global stroke statistics 2023: availability of reperfusion services around the world. International Journal of Stroke 2024;19(3):253-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930231210448
- 3. Ovbiagele B, Nguyen-Huynh MNJN. Stroke epidemiology: advancing our understanding of disease mechanism and therapy. Neurotherapeutics, 2011;8(3):319-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-011-0053-1
- 4. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel GJTL. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011;377(9778):1693-1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
- 5. Bernhardt J, Urimubenshi G, Gandhi DB, et al. Stroke rehabilitation in low-income and middle-income countries: a call to action. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):1452-1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31313-1
- 6. Pandian JD, Kalkonde Y, Sebastian IA, et al. Stroke systems of care in low-income and middle-income countries: challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):1443-1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31374-X PMID:33129395
- 7. Bernhardt J, Urimubenshi G, Gandhi DBC, et al. Stroke rehabilitation in low-income and middle-income countries: a call to action. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):1452-1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31313-1 PMID:33129396
- 8. Longley V, Peters S, Swarbrick C, et al. What factors affect clinical decision-making about access to stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(2):304-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518808000 PMID:30370792
- 9. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and the Stroke Council. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2402-2448. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e3181e7512b PMID:20813995
- 10. Kapral MK, Wang H, Mamdani M, et al. Effect of socioeconomic status on treatment and mortality after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(1):268-273. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0102.101169 PMID:11779921
- 11. Temehy B, Soundy A, Sahely A, et al. Exploring physiotherapists' perspectives on gaps in care continuity and their training needs to address these gaps for people with stroke in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study. Clin. Transl. Neurosci. 2025;9(3):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn9030042
- 12. Shahid J, Kashif A, Shahid MK. A comprehensive review of physical therapy interventions for stroke rehabilitation: impairment-based approaches and functional goals. Brain Sci. 2023;13(5):717. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13050717 PMID:37239189
- 13. Gouda HN, Charlson F, Sorsdahl K, et al. Burden of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(10):e1375-e1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30374-2
- 14. Akinyemi RO, Ovbiagele B, Adeniji OA, et al. Stroke in Africa: profile, progress, prospects and priorities. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(10):634-656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00542-4
- 15. Okekunle AP, Jones S, Adeniji O, et al. Stroke in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence and case-fatality rates. International Journal of Stroke 2023;18(6):634-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930221147164
- 16. Connor MD, Walker R, Modi G, et al. Burden of stroke in black populations in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet Neurology. 2007;6(3):269-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70002-9
- 17. Fryer C, Sturm A, Roth R, et al. Scarcity of resources and inequity in access are frequently reported ethical issues for physiotherapists internationally: an observational study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2021;22(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00663-x
- 18. Lekoubou A, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kengne APJBph. Epidemiology of neurodegenerative diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):653. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-653
- 19. Ayalew AT, Adane DT, Obolla SS, Ludago TB, Sona BD, Biewer G, eds. From community-based rehabilitation (CBR) services to inclusive development. A study on practice, challenges, and future prospects of CBR in Gedeo Zone (Southern Ethiopia). Frontiers in Education; 2020; 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.506050
- 20. Baye M, Hintze A, Gordon-Murer C, et al. Stroke characteristics and outcomes of adult patients in Northwest Ethiopia. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00428
- 21. Crawford T, Parsons J, Webber S, et al. Strategies to increase access to outpatient physiotherapy services: a scoping review. Physiotherapy Canada. 2022;74(2):197-207. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2020-0119
- 22. Tamrat EG, Gufue ZH, Getachew S, et al. Factors associated with the longer-term unmet supportive care needs of stroke survivors in Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open.2022;12(1):e053579. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053579
- 23. Fang Y, Chen X, Li H, et al. A study on additional early physiotherapy after stroke and factors affecting functional recovery. 2003;17(6):608-617. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr655oa
- 24. Picariello F, Carbone MM, Barni L, et al. The physiotherapist: The importance of early functional recovery. The frail surgical patient: a geriatric approach beyond age. Springer; 2025:321-349.
- 25. Vertesi A, Lever JA, Molloy DW, et al. Standardized mini-mental state examination. Use and interpretation. 2001;47(10):2018-2023. PMID: 11723596
- 26. Olaleye OA, Lawal ZI. Utilization of physiotherapy in the continuum of stroke care at a tertiary hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2017;17(1):79-87. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v17i1.11 PMID:29026380
- 27. Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):559-566. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070205 PMID:18292215
- 28. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65. PMID:14258950
- 29. Jutai J, Coulson S, Teasell R, et al. Mobility assistive device utilization in a prospective study of patients with first-ever stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(10):1268-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.773 PMID:17908568
- 30. Ojaghihaghighi S, Vahdati SS, Mikaeilpour A, et al. Comparison of neurological clinical manifestation in patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;8(1):34. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.01.006
- 31. Lin Y, Jiang Z, Zhan G, et al. Brain network characteristics between subacute and chronic stroke survivors in active, imagery, passive movement task: a pilot study. 2023;14:1143955. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fneur.2023.1143955
- 32. Wandile PMJH, Comorbidities. Hypertension and comorbidities: a silent threat to global health. 2024;1(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.46439/Hypertension.1.001
- 33. Greenberg SAJATAJoN. How to try this: the geriatric depression scale: short form. American Journal of Nursing. 2007;107(10):60-69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000292204.52313.f3
- 34. Khan M, Khan MF, Muneer B, et al. The Time Up & Go test to evaluate the change in functional mobility in post-stroke patients: Time Up and Go Test for change in functional mobility. 2022:309-312. https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i7.637.
- 35. Archer KJ, Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW. Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2007;51(9):4450-4464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.07.006
- 36. Bayman EO, Dexter FJA. Multicollinearity in logistic regression models. Analgesia. 2021:362-365.
- 37. Sun GW, Shook TL, Kay GLJJoce. Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996;49(8):907-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(96)00025-X
- 38. Kamalakannan S, Venkata MG, Prost A, et al. Rehabilitation needs of stroke survivors after discharge from hospital in India. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2016;97(9):1526-1532. e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.008
- 39. Hou WH, Ni CH, Li CY, et al. Stroke rehabilitation and risk of mortality: a population-based cohort study stratified by age and gender. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(6):1414-1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.03.006 PMID:25836631
- 40. Sarfo FS, Adusei N, Ampofo M, et al. Pilot trial of a tele-rehab intervention to improve outcomes after stroke in Ghana: a feasibility and user satisfaction study. J Neurol Sci. 2018;387:94-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.039
- 41. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al.; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98-e169. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098 PMID:27145936
- 42. Aderinto N, Olatunji G, Kokori E, et al. A scoping review of stroke rehabilitation in Africa: interventions, barriers, and research gaps. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2025;44(1):245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-01004-z
- 43. Kayola G, Mataa MM, Asukile M, et al. Stroke rehabilitation in low-and middle-income countries: challenges and opportunities. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2023;102(2S):S24-S32. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002128
- 44. Ogwumike OO, Badaru UM, Adeniyi AFJCHP. Barriers to treatment adherence among stroke survivors attending outpatient physiotherapy clinics in North-Western Nigeria. Clinical health promotion - research and best practice, Clinical Health Promotion Centre. 2015;5(1):4-10. https://doi.org/10.29102/CLINHP.15002
- 45. Legg L, Langhorne P. Outpatient service trialists. Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomized trials. Lancet. 2004;363(9406):352-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15434-2 PMID:15070563
- 46. Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. 2017;12(5):444-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017711816
- 47. Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, et al. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12)(suppl 2):S101-S114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016 PMID:16373145
- 48. Yeh HJ, Chen TA, Cheng HC, et al. Long-term rehabilitation utilization pattern among stroke patients under the National Health Insurance Program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(2):129-134. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001747 PMID:33782272
- 49. Freburger JK, Li D, Johnson AM, et al. Physical and occupational therapy from the acute to community setting after stroke: predictors of use, continuity of care, and timeliness of care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(6):1077-1089.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.007 PMID:28389108
- 50. dos Santos RB, Fiedler A, Badwal A, et al. Standardized tools for assessing balance and mobility in stroke clinical practice guidelines worldwide: a scoping review. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1084085
- 51. Bower K, Thilarajah S, Pua YH, et al. Dynamic balance and instrumented gait variables are independent predictors of falls following stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0478-4 PMID:30612584
- 52. Campbell GB, Matthews JT. An integrative review of factors associated with falls during post-stroke rehabilitation. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42(4):395-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01369.x PMID:21091622
- 53. Ahmad Ainuddin H, Romli MH, Hamid TA, et al. Stroke rehabilitation for falls and risk of falls in Southeast Asia: a scoping review with stakeholders' consultation. Front Public Health. 2021;9:611793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.611793
- 54. Liu H, Yin H, Yi Y, et al. Effects of different rehabilitation training on balance function in stroke patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci. 2023;19(6):1671-1683. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/167385 PMID:38058731
- 55. Saraiva J, Rosa G, Fernandes S, et al. Current trends in balance rehabilitation for stroke survivors: a scoping review of experimental studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(19):6829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20196829 PMID:37835099
- 56. Peters DM, O’Brien ES, Kamrud KE, et al. Utilization of wearable technology to assess gait and mobility post-stroke: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00863-x PMID:33882948
- 57. Li N, Zhang J, Du Y, et al. Gait speed after mild stroke/transient ischemic attack was associated with long-term adverse outcomes: a cohort study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024;11(12):3163-3174. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52222 PMID:39394716
- 58. Ng MM, Hill KD, Batchelor F, et al. Factors predicting falls and mobility outcomes in patients with stroke returning home after rehabilitation who are at risk of falling. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(12):2433-2441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.018 PMID:28647551
- 59. Grau-Pellicer M, Chamarro-Lusar A, Medina-Casanovas J, et al. Walking speed as a predictor of community mobility and quality of life after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26(5):349-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2019.1605751 PMID:31063439




